Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

º¹ÇÕ·¹Áø ¼öº¹½Ã »ç¿ëµÇ´Â ¼öÁ¾ÀÇ »ó¾ÆÁú °áÇÕÀçÀÇ ¹Ì¼¼´©Ãâ ¾ç»ó°ú Streptococcus mutans¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Ç×±ÕÈ¿°ú¿¡ °üÇÑ ºñ±³¿¬±¸

A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE MICROLEAKAGE PATTERNS AND ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY ON STREPTOCOCCUS MUTANS IN THREE DENTINAL BONDING AGENT

´ëÇѼҾÆÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 1995³â 22±Ç 1È£ p.340 ~ 350
ÀÓö¼ö, ÃÖ¿ëö,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÓö¼ö (  ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³
ÃÖ¿ëö (  ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

°á·Ð
º» ¿¬±¸´Â ÃÖ±Ù °³·®È­µÈ »ó¾ÆÁú°áÇÕÀçÀÎ Scotchbond multi-purpose¿Í GLUMA bonding
system ±×¸®°í ALL-BOND 2¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ¼Ò±¸Ä¡ 5±Þ ·¹Áø¼öº¹½Ã ¹ß»ýÇÏ´Â ¹Ì¼¼´©Ãâ ¾ç»ó
°ú Streptococcus mutans¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼¼±ÕÁõ½Ä ¾ïÁ¦È¿°ú ½ÇÇè °á°ú ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á·ÐÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. ¹Ì¼¼´©Ãâ ¾ç»óÀº °¢ ½ÇÇ豺 ¸ðµÎ ´Ù¾çÇÑ ºÐÆ÷¸¦ º¸¿´°í ½ÇÇ豺°£ÀÇ Åë°èÇÐÀû À¯ÀÇ Â÷´Â
Á¸ÀçÇÏÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù(P>0.05).
2. ½ÇÇ豺Áß Scotchbond multi-purpose¿Í GLUMA bonding systemÀÌ ´ëÁ¶±º(0.2%
chlorhexidine)°ú ºñ½ÁÇÑ Å©±âÀÇ ¼¼±ÕÁõ½Ä ¾ïÁ¦´ë¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú°í, ALL-BOND 2 ¿¡¼­´Â ´ëÁ¶
±º°ú ºñ±³ÇÏ¿© ÀÛÀº Å©±âÀÇ ¼¼±ÕÁõ½Ä ¾ïÁ¦´ë¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù.
3. °¢ ½ÇÇ豺 ¸ðµÎ aerobic chamber¿¡¼­ ¹è¾ç½Ã anaerobic chamberÀÇ ¹è¾ç½Ãº¸´Ù ´õ Å« ¼¼
±ÕÁõ½Ä ¾ïÁ¦´ë¸¦ º¸¿´´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the microleakage patterns and to
compare antimicrobial activity on Streptococcus mutans in three dentinal bonding agent.
Scotchbond multi-purpose, GLUMA bonding system and ALL-BOND were used as test
materials and 60 extracted premolars were selected.
For evaluation of microleakage patterns, methylene blue were penetrated and then cut,
microleakage patterns were graded by stereomicroscopic observation.
For comparison of antimicrobial activity, Streptococcus mutans (ATTC 27351) were
grown in brain heart infusion(BHI) broth, after inoculated, the disk diffusion test were
carried out.
After all plate were incubated for 48 hrs at 37 C, inhibitory zones were measured with
a sliding calipers. Antimicrobial test were repeated three times.
The results can be summarized as follows
1. The microleakage in each experimental groups showed various patterns and there
were no statistical significance in three dentinal bonding agent.
2. The mean values of the inhibition zones in Scotchbond and GLUMA were revealed
as same as in control. In ALL-BOND 2 the inhibition zones were less than control.
3. In every experimental groups, the inhibition zones were bigger in aerobic incubation
than anaerobic incubation.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI